However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 14, 2014, at around 21:15, the Defendant reported at “Dju” located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, to the police officer’s slopeF (34 years old), who listens to the circumstances of the case by sending the report after having received 112 that there was an assault incident, and, without any justifiable reason, assaulted the Defendant, such as “bring, yachting, and spathing” to the police officer’s slopeF (34 years old) of the Dobong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, a police box, which reads “bring, spathing, and killed,” and

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reported handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence shall be determined as per the disposition, taking into consideration the following: (a) there is no previous conviction for the same kind of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the crime of this case was committed in a contingency under the influence of alcohol; and (c) the fact that a confession of the crime of this case and two children are liable to support them; and (d