If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

1. On April 6, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 00:40 on April 6, 2015, the Defendant, within the Busan Coast Guard C police box; and (b) on the part of the police box affiliated with the above police box, “a person divingd in a place other than his/her residence, as he/she has been urged to report domestic violence”; and (c) brought about a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior at a government office for about 20 minutes, such as “a person who has been divingd in a place other than his/her

2. On April 6, 2015, around 02:00, the Defendant received 112 report that the Defendant, who was subject to emergency measures (a separate measure with the victim) due to domestic violence, would enter the house again, at around 5:502, 502, the Defendant, who was in charge of obstruction of performance of performance of official duties, and recommended the Defendant to move from the above D to another place, in his/her hand, to put the name tag on his/her own, and threatened him/her “I are retaliationed against the present worker. I are the police, and I are off the clothes.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each statement made to D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site photographs/CCTV images);

1. Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, the choice of fines - Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 3 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Education [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (the special person) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence] that the defendant was punished by a fine of three million won for the same crime in 2015 is unfavorable.

However, it is important that the defendant reflects the wrong and the degree of interference with official business.