However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On October 2016, the Defendant modified the official document without authority for the purpose of exercising B apartment Nos. 103 1501, B, 1501, and one’s dwelling place, and without authority, changed the official document by stating “E” as indicated in the vehicle number column among the certificate of parking of disabled persons, which is a public document issued by the head of Ycheon-gun C, the Y C, and making the official document changed with “E” on the spot using a color-slided pen.

2. From November 15, 2016 to November 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) parked a vehicle with disability in the apartment parking zone for the disabled as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) in which he/she resides; and (b) held the altered parking sign on the front glass of the relevant vehicle as if he/she actually issued the altered parking sign certificate, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written accusation of the F production;

1. Investigation reports (verification of the person in charge of the issuing authority of official documents and submission of suspect evidence);

1. Details of the issuance of parking signs for persons with disabilities (C pages);

1. Details of comprehensive vehicle taxes;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the visual closure data;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (a point of altered official documents), Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of modified official documents);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (hereinafter the following sentencing is considered as favorable to the sentencing) does not correspond to the nature of a crime in light of the background, method, contents, etc. of the crime. However, the fact that the defendant is against the mistake, that the defendant does not have any criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine, and that the defendant’s age, sex, occupation, family relation, etc. are also taken into account.