except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2014 Highest 4271]

1. Occupational embezzlement;

A. From January 2010, the Defendant worked for the victim D in the first floor of the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, as a delivery employee, and was engaged in the business of collecting food prices. On January 28, 2010, the Defendant kept 2.50,000 won of food collected around January 28, 2010 for the victim, and arbitrarily consumed the food for personal purposes in Daejeon.

B. From October 23, 201, the Defendant worked as delivery employee at H restaurant operated by the victim G in the Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, and was engaged in the business of collecting food costs. On December 29, 201, around December 29, 201, the Defendant stored the total of KRW 33,000 for delivery reserve funds and KRW 218,000 for the victim, and arbitrarily consumed the amount for personal purposes from Daejeon, for the personal purpose.

C. From January 13, 2012, the Defendant served as a delivery employee by K restaurants operated by the victim JJ in Seo-gu Daejeon from around January 13, 2012, and was engaged in the business of collecting food charges, the Defendant kept 400,000 won of food collected around January 14, 2012 for the victim, and consumed at his own discretion for personal purposes in Daejeon.

From February 6, 2012, the Defendant had been working as delivery employee at N restaurants operated by the VictimM in Daejeon-gu L, Daejeon, and was engaged in the business of collecting food prices. On February 8, 2012, around February 8, 2012, the Defendant kept the total of KRW 41,000 and the total of KRW 76,000 for the delivery reserve and the total of KRW 35,000 for the imported food, and used at his own discretion for personal purposes in Daejeon-gu.

2. Fraud;

A. From October 23, 2011 to October 23, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A H restaurant operated by the victim G in the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon as a delivery employee,” and that “Around December 26, 2011, the Defendant would make a false statement to the victim with the same place to the effect that “Around December 26, 2011, it is necessary to pay for the expenses for the care and training of his/her daughters, but he/she will make a monthly payment.”

However, the defendant is above.