The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. On April 25, 2017, the Defendant made a claim against the victim B (48 years of age) from the head of the office of the management office of the public apartment complex in Yeongdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu to prohibit the use of the actual part of the apartment competition, and caused the pressure tracing the part of the victim’s growth into the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of approximately 21 days to the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, had the victim A (53) sign on the letter of approval for the actual use of the Games, and had the victim go beyond the floor by pushing the victim’s chest part of the defective victim’s chest, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness A, B, D, and E;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. Determination on each of the Defendants and defense counsel’s arguments under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. Defendant A set an objection against the Defendant’s failure of the Victim B to use an apartment racing room, but during that process, the Defendant did not have committed an injury identical to the facts charged on the part of the Victim by cutting off the part of the victim’s growth and cutting down the part of his growth.

B. Defendant B did not have inflicted an injury on the victim as described in the facts charged by pushing the victim A’s chest part of his chest.

2. In full view of all the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the Defendants’ respective arguments by the Defendants and the defense counsel are not acceptable, since all of the Defendants’ acts as stated in the facts constituting the crime are sufficiently recognized.

(a) The victim B and A shall be the victim;