beta
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2019.07.02 2019가단50073

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion provides the Plaintiff with a bank loan around February 2, 201, the Defendant: (a) obtained a certificate of personal seal impression, seal imprint, and a certified copy of resident registration from the Plaintiff; (b) obtained the Plaintiff’s certificate; and (c) used the certificate of business registration in the Plaintiff’s name; (d) used the certificate of business registration; and (e) provided the iron plates from C; and (e) went away without paying KRW 138,657,808.

Accordingly, C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking the payment of the said steel purchase price (hereinafter “related lawsuit”) and received a favorable judgment (Seoul Southern District Court 2014Gahap5457). As the said judgment became final and conclusive, C brought damages to C to the Plaintiff. However, the Plaintiff sought a payment of the amount equivalent to the above judgment amount to the Defendant.

2. According to the evidence evidence No. 1 (including the provisional number), although it is recognized that C was sentenced to a favorable judgment in a related lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff against the Plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize that the above facts of recognition and the remainder of evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone are engaged in the iron wholesale business by stealing the Plaintiff’s name, and that the Plaintiff had the Plaintiff bear the obligation of the judgment amount, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.