The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted all of the facts charged of the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on the degree of probative value of evidence for conviction in a trust agreement under Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, or in a criminal trial, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.