If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Victim C is an instructor of the Chungcheong branch E and required by the D Research Institute. Since 2011, the Defendant was unable to provide the victim with the required classes, he is currently in active activities as a family instructor.

The Defendant, on December 27, 2015, at the “G” restaurant located in the Northern-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul on December 27, 2015, and the facts are as follows: (a) despite the absence of the fact that the victim, alone, has divorced and raises children, the Defendant refers to the married children on the part of the victim, excluding the victim, at the seat of five leaders.

“.....”

This hearing was held.

H is not a defendant’s “not.”

I also seen that there was a set of sons and coffees in the part of the country.

“A man who has met in a single country is not her husband but her husband.”

N. Whether or not you have confirmed

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, H and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of marriage certificates which are complainants);

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant denies the initial offender or his mistake, and that the victim did not have any true apology.

In addition to this, all the circumstances revealed in the trial process, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.