However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 22:10 on July 6, 2019, the Defendant sought at the farm office of the victim C (Nam, 71 years of age) located in Gangseo-gun, Gangwon-gun, and, on the ground that the victim did not perform his/her investment promise, the Defendant stated that the victim “I will live well, equally, and live promptly. I will die. I will die within the body of the victim.” On the part of the victim, he/she carried the body of the victim up several times, and continued to put the chair, which is a dangerous object in the above office, into the head, and continued to put the victim up to the entrance.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

The Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million on September 11, 2008 with the history of having been sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court's Branch Branch on September 11, 2008.

On July 6, 2019, at around 22:06, the Defendant driven a F rash car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.132% from the 39km section to the front road of the office of “E” located in the same group B in front of Pyeongtaek-gun, Gangwon-do.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 356"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and G;

1. As to the crime of special assault in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel against the 112 Reporting Report case list, field photographs, investigation report (related to the process of preparing the statement of reference) and special assault, the defendant asserts that "the victim first renders the defendant's shoulder and breast part of the defendant's shoulder and breast part, and then his bath and arbits in the process of setting up against it, and the defendant sits against the victim's will, rather than putting the victim's interest, it is nothing more than flading the victim's interest, and it is nothing more than flading the victim's interest behind."

However, the victim and witness G made a statement consistent with the facts charged in this court, and they are not specific and exaggerated about the statement, behavior, the location of the defendant and the victim at the time of the case.