If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. From around 02:05 on July 12, 2012 to 02:45 on the same day, the Defendant spit down the flab in the D restaurant operated by the victim C located in the city B, making food on the instant day, and then obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. Around 02:45 on July 12, 2012, the Defendant insultd the victim openly insulting the victim on the ground that the victim E, a police officer called out after receiving a report at the above restaurant, asked the victim’s face of the victim for reasons not to pay the food value, citing C and F, etc., he/she asked him/her about whether the victim’s face is her, and he/she does not want to talk with the police her. He/she is not a police her. He/she does not want to her to her. He/she she she will she face with the width police her. He/she is she. He/she she she will do not talk about it. He/she she will do so. He/she will she

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of C and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Borrowing reports, and application of each Act and subordinate statutes for reporting the investigation;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;