2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff is a person who intends to build multi-family housing and neighborhood living facilities on the Busan B and nine lots (hereinafter referred to as "the site of this case").

▣ 건축위원회 재심의 보완사항

1. In relation to a traffic plan, the improvement and review of the traffic congestion on the road 10 meters on the side of the Dong, considering the traffic congestion on the road, and the installation of infant facilities is anticipated to increase the access road due to school vehicles and garbage vehicles, so it is necessary to review the improvement and review the traffic congestion if necessary;

3. Change of the direction of the entrance of the first floor, securing of additional passages, re-planing of unnecessary space next to the stairs room, and securing of additional space for entry space of the main entrance and exit of the main entrance of the apartment on the side of a provisional road;

4. Plans to clarify the location of art decorations and food so as not to interfere with neighboring sites, buildings and buildings;

5. A plan to reconstruct a passage and a plan for bicycle riding so as not to cause inconvenience to all households to use the waste separation site;

6. Review of the installation of provisional facilities part of neighboring site boundary at the time of construction;

7. The plan to reorganize the moving line from the main entrance to the main entrance of an apartment on the main road along the main road because it is dangerous to ensure that infants' facilities have no access to the road;

8. On August 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for a construction review on the instant site area of 2,440.7 square meters, building area of 1,452.24 square meters, total floor area of 17,357.135 square meters, building-to-land ratio of 59.501 square meters, floor area ratio of 483.9%, and multi-family housing of 20 stories above ground of 3 stories (multi-family housing in neighboring residential facilities) on the instant site.

On September 23, 2016, the Building Committee to which the Defendant belongs passed a resolution for reexamination on the following supplementary matters, including the improvement of traffic plans, and the Defendant sent a letter to the Plaintiff on September 28, 2016, stating that the result of the deliberation should be reflected in the deliberation result (matters to be supplemented by the review) and implementing the procedures for reexamination of the Building Committee.

3.