On January 21, 1997, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months in the Seoul Northern District Court for night building intrusion larceny. On November 13, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months in the Gwangju District Court for larceny, etc., and on April 21, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment of 2 years in the Gwangju District Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the said sentence on March 19, 2012.

1. On March 24, 2014, at around 02:35, the Defendant: (a) opened a 2nd floor door of the victim D (the age of 30) located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu and opened a 2nd floor door where no correction was made; and (b) opened a string door door to which the string door was not corrected; and (c) was discovered to the victim returning home, the Defendant: (a) opened the string door door and discovered the string door to the right string door for the purpose of evading arrest; (b) opened a string door to the right string door; and (c) caused the victim to wear the string door of the string door on the floor; and (d) caused the victim to wear the string door of the string door in the process of examining the hand hand of the string door on the floor.

2. On March 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (thief) around 03:21, 201, on the grounds that: (a) the victim F’s house located in E 2nd floor, opened an unsatisfy gate and intrudes into the inner bank through the entrance door, and used one b5,000 won in cash owned by the victim; (b) one b5,000 won in capital owned by the victim; (c) one head of the agricultural cooperative and Gwangju Bank; and (d) one b) one biff in which a seal imprint exists; and (c) from May 28, 2012 to March 24, 2014, the Defendant attempted to steal the goods owned by the victims over a total of 28 occasions on the grounds that the market price of the goods owned by the victims was stolen or the victim was stolen.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolens or attempted to steals articles owned by the victims, and the defendant did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1..