대여금
The defendant 12,208,200 won to the plaintiff A, 42,208,200 won to the plaintiff B, 22,208,200 won to the plaintiff C, and 17,300 won to the plaintiff D.
The main points of the plaintiffs' assertion are the guidances operated by the defendant.
Plaintiff
A) The Defendant’s embezzlement of KRW 24,50,00 and KRW 20 per month interest on the above accounts and separate loans of KRW 10,000, KRW 000, KRW 1000, KRW 10,700, KRW 180,000 on the damages for mental stress, and KRW 330,000 on the damages for 10,000, KRW 12,00,00 and interest thereon, KRW 10,000 on the Defendant’s embezzlement of KRW 24,50, KRW 00, KRW 00, KRW 800 on the total amount of interest on the above accounts and loans of KRW 10,00, KRW 00 on the Defendant’s embezzlement of KRW 10,00 on the damages for 0, KRW 10,000, KRW 80 on the damages for 0,000, KRW 10,000 on the Defendant’s embezzlement of KRW 10,000.
Judgment
Plaintiff
There is no dispute between the parties that there is KRW 12,208,200 that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff in connection with the operation of the fraternity.
However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff A alone is sufficient to support the defendant's embezzlement of the amount claimed by the plaintiff A.
It is not enough to recognize the fact that the defendant is obliged to pay interest, and it is different.