beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.03.08 2017고단1659

주거침입등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1659"

1. In the middle of July 2017, the Defendant of intimidation: (a) on the first floor of the 1st floor of the Busan High-gu C building in Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, the Defendant showed that the victim D does not take the responsibility for width without the Defendant’s telephone, “I will see to the end of the district if the Defendant does not take the responsibility for width; (b) one of the people who died or died of the death of the width; and (c) one of the people who died of the death of

From around October 31, 2017, “ From time to time,” the victim threatened the victim by making a speech that seems to inflict bodily harm on the victim at least 18 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, or by sending text messages.

2. Intrusion Victims E shall have the victims of the instant one-way intimidation incident D.

On August 6, 2017, around 20:51, the Defendant infringed upon the victim’s residence with the F and O’s consent door from the Busan Sho-gu F and the P, and thereby, kidddd the first race of the above OOO, opened several doors, and opened the door, and infringed the victim’s peace in residence by continuously opening the door despite the victim’s demand for eviction.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving of Gpoter 1752 with a closure flusing cargo.

On August 23, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on August 14:5, 2017, while driving the second front road of the central Dop, which is located in the city of the death of Busan, at a speed of about 10km from the direction of the subway station at the speed of about 10km from the direction of the subway station at the speed of the city.

Since the place was parked on the right and right side of the road along the intersection, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the right and the right side of the vehicle driver and proceeding well to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and left the victim H who was parked on the right side of the proceeding direction due to negligence before the right.