2. Determination

A. The Defendant did not have assault the victim, and denies the crime of this case.

B. The evidence presented as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes C (victim) and D’s protocol of examination of each witness, and each police interrogation protocol. However, in light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence, it is difficult to believe that C and D’s statements are inconsistent with each other or exaggerated.

1) The victim stated that he was the victim's chest by her head, and that D was the victim's breast, but D was the victim's breast at home. The victim and D submitted an USB containing a sound of dispute with the victim when she was in his own house. The victim and D had a conversation from the time when she was in the defendant's house to the time she was dispatched by police officers, and the contents of the conversation are primarily to attract the victim's high character and fighting, the defendant, the victim, and D expressed their desire to the police and report to the defendant during that process.

3 The victim and D stated that they had a knife and knife the defendant, but the police officers dispatched to the disputed process were found to have a knife and knife at the defendant's house, but did not find any knife.

With respect to the time when the defendant gets her chest of the victim, the victim said that the defendant was her knife and her knife and her knife was displayed outside the house.

However, there is no circumstance that the defendant had knife or kids until the police officer called out through the file recorded in the USB.