When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 15, 2014, at around 23:40, the Defendant damaged the part of the vehicle connecting the market price, which is the victim C company owned by the victim C company, that was placed in and around another person in the street before the logistics warehouse of the C company located B, by shoting a signboard with an unclaimed parking guide in and around the city of other persons.

2. On May 15, 2014, at around 23:55, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the Defendant’s face on one occasion, as a drink or drinking, to verify the situation where the slope E belonging to the Masp police station, who was dispatched after receiving a report at the above location, used to identify the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) the defect that E attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (c) “Cho

E. The Plaintiff was able to receive the parts of E in the head by sound as “the satisfy sat.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Selection of each fine, taking into account the fact that the option of the punishment is divided, the fact that an agreement is reached with the victim of damage to property, and the fact that there is no special criminal record other than the fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;