beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고단6671

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2014, at around 01:40, the Defendant: (a) called that no taxi exists under the influence of alcohol after having arrived at the entrance of the Jung-gu D apartment court in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) the victim was able to make two times a part of the face of the victim by drinking 112 of the defective report; and (c) the victim attempted to leave the place as it is; (d) the victim intending to walk the victim’s bridge by walking the victim’s bridge to the victim’s kid away from the floor; and (e) caused the victim’s injury, such as cutting down the left-hand aggregate that requires treatment for about 35 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A photo of the damaged part;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the 112 reported content lists, recording records;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury [No person in general] [Decision of Sentence 1] (No person in special form] [Decision of Sentence 1] (No person in special form] / The degree of injury is significant for the victim as a result of the Defendant’s commission of the commission of the five-way custody due to the Defendant’s commission of the commission of the crime, and the damage has not been affected: Provided, That in this court, the Defendant was found to have been mistakenly punished, and other circumstances such as the motive, circumstance, means and method of the crime in this case, circumstance before and after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, career, environment, etc. as shown in the arguments in this case, shall be determined as ordered by taking full account of the following circumstances.