Seized evidence 1 to 7 shall be confiscated.

On May 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened two copies of the above-mentioned self-employed box around 04:00 on the first floor of “D Library” located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, in order to find out a drinking water plate equivalent to KRW 1.5 million in the market value; and (b) opened the drinking water plate equivalent to KRW 3 million in the market value; and (c) opened two copies of the cash in the victim’s possession; and (d) opened two copies of the above-mentioned self-employed box; and (d) removed the drinking water plate from the dracker and nitrous that were in possession; and (e) deducted the sum of the cash in the

From that time to June 12, 2017, five keys (a total of 9.640,000 won in the market price) were damaged by the same method, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 4 times, from that time, from that time to that time, and the total amount of cash owned by each victim was stolen with a total of 4.80,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A written statement of E and H preparation;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seized articles and photographs thereof;

1. A written estimate and a statement of transactions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photograph, CCTV photograph, site photograph, photo of a damaged site, photograph of a damaged site, and CCTV photograph;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act, as in the instant case, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, has committed the instant crime even though there were a number of punishments, including a number of punishment, due to the commission of the same veterinary act, destroying the self-reader installed in a religious facility and theft of the picture.

In addition, the damage has not been completely recovered.

Considering these circumstances, a sentence shall be imposed on the defendant because it is inevitable to punish the defendant strictly.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant confessions all of the crimes and reflects them, and that the defendant seems to have reached the crime in an economic difficult situation, and that the defendant actually committed the case.