2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant recognized the crime of this case as one of the defendant's mistake, agreed with the victim, and the economic situation is not clear. However, the crime of this case is not unfair because the defendant escaped without taking any measures to cause a traffic accident that damages the front door of the damaged vehicle to require repair cost of 1,300,000 won due to the shock of the victim C driver's taxi, and the case is not easy. The defendant has been punished twice due to the vehicle driving-related crimes. The court below determined the punishment against the defendant in consideration of various circumstances, and there is no change of circumstance at the trial, and there is no change of circumstance at the trial, and there is no other reason to change the situation at the trial, the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.