A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

To the extent that it does not disadvantage the defendants' exercise of their right to defense, some of the facts charged were corrected or corrected according to facts obtained through the examination of evidence without amendment procedures.

Defendant

A is a person who leases the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Award C and operates a private teaching institute, and the defendant B is a sectional owner of the same commercial building F, who operates a G border.

1. Eight persons, including the Defendants who interfere with the duties of the Defendants, including C Sang-Ga tenants, enter the J pharmacy operated by C Sang-si from September 15, 2017 to 15:30 of the same day, and C Sang-si, the victim’s husband, the representative of the building owner, was not able to repair C Sang-si toilets, and the victim’s husband, K, who is the representative of the building owner, could not enter the pharmacy.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the victim's pharmacy business by force for about 20 minutes.

2. Around November 28, 2017, Defendant A violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) by Defendant A, etc. of the Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Protection Act (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”) published false information with the content that “ATM management fee is deposited into the K account of 1.5 million won per month, including rent, management fee, and additional tax, when entering into a contract with MP bank.” However, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim for the purpose of slandering KR.

3. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) by Defendant B;

A. On June 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) there was no fact that the Defendant: (b) there was a lack of finding that the victim I embezzled public funds to another person; and (c) there was no fact that the Defendant: (a) there was a little fact that the victim I embezzled public funds to the other person; (b) the Defendant misappropriated C commercial funds to I on the last Saturday.