beta
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2019.08.27 2019가단31726

소유권이전등기

Text

1. Of each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, with respect to Defendant B’s share of 3/21, Defendant C’s share of 6/105.

Reasons

1. On March 8, 1965, M&D completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale and purchase of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

In relation to Defendant B’s spouse of Defendant E networks M, Defendant F’s child named “Defendant G”, Defendant H’s “Defendant H”, Defendant C’s “Defendant C”, and Defendant C’s “Defendant C’s spouse” died on August 29, 200, when Defendant C’s spouse died earlier than Defendant D’s M, the deceased’s wife N’s child network M died on August 29, 200, and the deceased’s heir’s list at the time is as follows:

On May 10, 2001, the Plaintiff agreed on the division of inherited property between the Defendants, who are other successors of the deceased M, and the Plaintiff, with the content that the ownership of each of the instant real estate should be reverted to the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff and the Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 21, 2019 with respect to each of the instant real estate on August 29, 200. The ratio of shares in which the Plaintiff and the Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer is as follows.

- Defendant B: 3/21 Shares - Shares - Shares 2/21 of the Plaintiff, Defendant E, F, G, H, I, J, and K: each 2/21 Shares - Shares - Shares 6/105 of the Defendant C: Defendant D: 4/105 Shares - Shares / [based on recognition] against Defendant E: Each entry of evidence 1-1, 2, and evidence 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and any dispute against the remaining Defendants:

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, with respect to the Plaintiff’s share 3/21 as to each of the instant real estate, Defendant C is obligated to perform the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on the agreement on the division of inherited property as of May 10, 2001 with respect to the share 6/105 as to the share 6/105 as to Defendant D’s share 4/105 as to each of the instant real estate, Defendant E, F, G, H, I, J, and K, respectively.

3. In conclusion, each claim against the Defendants by the Plaintiff is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.