성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
1. Defendant D’s imprisonment with prison labor of eight months, Defendant A, F, and G KRW 10,000,000, and Defendant B’s fine of KRW 7,000,000, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
On March 14, 2016, the Defendant employed female employees, such as Q and R, from the third floor of the building in Daegu Northern-gu P on March 14, 2016, the Defendant received 110,00 won in cash per time from the male and female employees who are unable to know the name of the customer, such as two police officers, and paid the said female employees the money calculated as KRW 70,000 per time out of the sexual traffic amount received from customers.
Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.
[Defendant A, B, C, and D] 2016 Highest 5630 [Defendant A, B, C, and D]
1. Defendants A and D jointly committed a sexual traffic business establishment on January 2015, 201 for the first time to jointly operate a sexual traffic business establishment. Defendant D invested money such as leased deposit, etc. to lease studio, etc. in its own name, and Defendant A decided to take charge of the business of advertising a sexual traffic business establishment and operating it actually.
A. On January 2015, the Defendants leased Nos. 201 and 202 of the Taesung-gu Si Building 201 and 202, and received 1.30,000 won from the non-existent male in the said place as the price for sexual intercourse, and let TR, a female employee, engage in sexual intercourse. From that time, until January 2015, the Defendants received 1.30,000 won from many unspecified male customers as the price for sexual intercourse from the said sexual intercourse business place, and had female employees receive 1.3 billion won as the price for sexual intercourse.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for sexual traffic.
B. On March 2015, the Defendants operated “V” (hereinafter “V”) sexual traffic business establishments located in Daegu Suwon-gu U, and received 110,000 won from the non- males as the price for sexual traffic at that place, and had T, female employees, engage in sexual intercourse. From that time to June 2015, the Defendants received 110,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from many unspecified male guests at the said sexual traffic business establishment, and had female employees receive 1,100,000 won as the price for sexual intercourse.
In this respect.