On June 1, 2016, around 22:27, the Defendant committed assault against the victim on the ground that the Defendant parked the vehicle in front of the residence of the victim in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, on the ground that the Defendant parked the vehicle in front of the residence of the victim, thereby committing assaulting the victim.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value that makes a judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it shall be judged as the interest of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001).B. According to the evidence duly adopted and duly examined by this court, C appears to have been parked due to the problem of parking from before his/her father E and around Sept. 23, 2015; C was punished for a fine of two million won due to the criminal facts that damaged the wheels of the vehicle owned by E on Sept. 23, 2015; C took a bath to E at the time and place as stated in the facts charged, and C took a dispute with his/her mother E, the interest of the defendant's wife, and C.

Recognizing the fact that C was entered into the house, C seems to have been treated with the pains and strings of the back.

In light of the above facts and circumstances, C’s statement and opinion, and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone are proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt about the Defendant’s assaulting of C.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. Conclusion.