사기미수등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of all the circumstances, such as the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the Defendant is against the Defendant; (b) the Defendant was performing a passive role in the instant crime of gambling; and (c) the degree of participation in the instant crime is not significant; and (d) the instant crime of gambling was committed in an attempted attempt in the amount of equipment failure; and (c) the Defendant was deprived of money, the punishment (a fine of eight months and one million won, and confiscation) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant, and it is recognized that the cash, etc. possessed by the defendant at the time was confiscated and attempted due to being discovered at the scene of the crime of gambling in this case.
However, the crime of attempted fraud in this case committed by the defendant in collusion with B, C, and D by reading the other party's card in collusion with the other party's card installed in the gambling place. The crime of attempted fraud in this case is not clear that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime, by sharing a systematic and secret role, and by committing fraud, it is not good to the quality of the crime in light of the water law, etc.