However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the part of the criminal records irrelevant to the facts charged is deleted.

On March 25, 2016, around 00:40 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant was on board the back seat of the D-si operated by the Victim C (57 Do) with female-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

For the reason that it was called “,” plucking out the hands from the back seat to the right side of the hand hand, and the victim C, which is playing, stopped the above taxi to the side side immediately adjacent to the road, making the victim C face from the back seat up to the side.

When the victim C, who was unable to see this, requested the victim E (59) of another taxi engineer in the signal waiting at the side line, the defendant landed from the taxi, and the victim C got out of the taxi and walked several times by leaving the victim by the defendant up to the surface of the road, and even the victim E, the victim E is also replaced by the victim.

“The face and body of a person who takes the face and body of a person who takes part in several times.”

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim C, who is a driver of a vehicle in operation, and suffered bodily injury, such as a trend of light, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered two infinites of the number of days of treatment E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness C and E;

1. A victim's body photograph, diagnostic certificate, and dental certificate;

1. Chapter 1 of the CDA (Back Ba) (Defendant and his defense counsel did not assault C, which is a taxi driver, only after he gets off a taxi driven by C, while assaulted C, which is a taxi driver, after he gets off a taxi driven by C;

The argument is asserted.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., C, a bus out of the photographs attached to the examination record of witness C under the white high-priced bottom in the Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.