However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:50 on September 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took the front of the Jeju-dong Police Station C District District D on the front of the Jeju-dong Police Station C District ; (b) took the Defendant’s daily e and F as a fact of crossing without permission; (c) took the body of D due to the defect in order to issue a notice of penalty to E; and (d) took the Defendant’s desire to “batome and spule”, and forced the output of the portable penalty notice cited by D.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted D and interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers on the crackdown.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D and G;

1. Investigation report (with respect to the suspect's unauthorized crossing cases), and details of computer data inputs of traffic regulation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes accompanying the interview at Jeju;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: It is so decided as per Disposition by the reason of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act or more;

The reason for sentencing (within the range of the sentencing guidelines) the area of reduction of the obstruction of performance of official duties: normal conditions favorable to August: Where the degree of assault and intimidation is insignificant, there are no criminal records of the same kind or suspension of execution or more;