However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of the case (K) 5 taxi.

On June 4, 2015, the Defendant driven the above taxi on June 16:40, and proceeded along one lane from the trade side of the D main road located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, according to the first lane, and changed the course to the fourth-lane of the said road in order for passengers to board the taxi.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to make a change of course by operating a direction direction when changing the vehicle line and giving prior notice of a change of course and to make a change in the traffic situation of the front and rear left-hand.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the said victim to go beyond the road by taking the front part of the victim E (the age of 56) driven by the victim E (the age of 56) who passed along the three-lane of the said road, following the right part of the said taxi that the Defendant drives on the right side of the taxi due to the negligence of changing the lane into the right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on June 8, 2015 caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence at the Gyeyang University’s Property Hospital, which was in the middle-gu of Daegu on June 8, 2015, due to the achievement of the 56 middle-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] General Traffic Accidents in Type II (Special Mitigation) [including April-10] Punishment and Non-Voluntary (including serious efforts to recover damage] [Determination of a sentence] The defendant caused the death of a victim due to the instant accident, but the defendant has agreed with the victim's bereaved family members. However, the defendant has agreed with the victim's bereaved family members. The reason is that the victim's age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various reasons for sentencing shown in the argument of the instant case, including circumstances after the crime.