When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is booming with the victim B with the victim.

The Defendant on April 18, 2018, the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City around 11:00

C. Within 102 Dong 1401, the victim stolen and stolen the property equivalent to KRW 2.2 million in total, including 10,000,000,000,000 for 10,000,000,000 for 1,000,000 for 1401.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant received juvenile protective disposition several times for the same kind of crime prior to the sentencing, the Defendant committed the instant crime again without being aware of the fact that he/she was under trial for the same kind of crime, and did not reach an agreement with the victim, etc., it is necessary to punish the corresponding strict punishment.

However, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime in this case while committing the crime in favor of the defendant, etc., the defendant's mistake is divided is considered as favorable to the defendant, and in addition, taking into account all factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, consequence, and circumstances after the crime.