However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On May 25, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the support of the Friwon Friju, and on January 26, 2017, the Defendant filed a request for a summary order of KRW 3 million due to the same crime as the support of Friju Friju, etc.

[2] On April 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle with alcohol content of 0.140% at around 14:42, while under the influence of alcohol; (b) and (c) from around 19,00, the Defendant driven a vehicle with alcohol content of 0.140% at around 71-1,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., circumstances in which no record of punishment heavier than a fine exists);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;