beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.05.29 2014고단1018

상해등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 13, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the control of crime by assaulting the police officer, such as “Ba, Chewing, and Chewing, to a slope affiliated with a slope of the Fagu Police Station, dispatched after receiving a report from 112 of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, that “the Defendant facing the facing to drink” at his/her own residence located in Hanam-si, Hannam-si, upon receiving the report from 112 of the Ministry of Health and Welfare.”

2. The Defendant damaged public goods by arresting the Defendant in the act of committing an offense under suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties, such as the statement of Paragraph 1, and thereby damaging public goods by the police officers, such as: (a) “I have left a police station; (b) I have left a few patrol units; (c) I have called “I have left a certain police station; (d) I have left a few patrol units; and (d) I have scood the scoo because I have scood the patrol scoos by drinking the patrol scoos; and (e) having the partitions display.

3. On May 13, 2014, the Defendant arrested a police officer on charges of obstruction of the performance of official duties, such as the statement of Paragraph (1), and was transferred to the Ftation of the Hanam Police Station to the Ftation on the charge of obstruction of the performance of official duties, and, on May 13, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, who continued to have the slopeH affiliated with the said police box, desireing and threatening the police officer to commit a crime, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of the crime, and at the same time, inflicted injury upon the victim requiring medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each police statement of G and H;

3. A medical certificate;

4. Application of statutes on site photographs.

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act corresponding to the relevant criminal facts; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

4. The suspended execution is against Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the punishment of the defendant shall be imposed by mutual agreement with the victimized police officers.