When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around October 2013, the Defendant, his spouse, was dismissed at the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and was unable to receive wages and retirement allowances, did not communicate with the victim, and the Defendant was willing to resist the victim by making the objection on the Internet, and made the objection, and had access to the Defendant’s name “Kakakaxo” (F) on October 2013 and then changed the victim’s photo into the victim’s photo, and added the victim’s photo to the victim’s photo, “I change the victim’s photo, and all kinds of fraud information,” as shown in the attached list of crimes, from around that time to January 15, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the data to close a complaint, to destroy defamation and to close down a letter, to confirm, and to insult;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. A provisional payment order: A sentence shall be imposed as ordered by considering all the following circumstances as a result of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the following circumstances: Recognizing and reflecting the facts of the crime, and some of the extenuating circumstances exist in the motive of the crime: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the defendant's occupation, family relations, economic conditions, and existing criminal records