beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.26 2016나10602

장비사용료

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant filed an appeal and added the judgment under the following paragraph 2, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. From April 5, 2014 to May 17, 2014, the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant incurred the Defendant’s obligation to pay rent for the instant incentive 1) was terminated on April 4, 2014 and did not use or profit from the Defendant. In addition, at the time of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not agree to guarantee the term of lease for the instant incentive 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000.