2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 15, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) was employed as a internal tree course and was performing the interior artificial decoration construction work at the construction site of the apartment house located in Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si; (b) on December 15, 2018, the Plaintiff was killed at a height of about 2 meters at the height of 2 meters.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

On January 9, 2019, the Plaintiff filed the first medical care benefit application with the Defendant on the instant accident, asserting that “the Plaintiff was injured by the pelvis of the pelvis of the pelvis of the right side, the pelvis of the outer side of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the river, the pelvis of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the pelvis, the pelvis of the pelvis, the pel

C. On February 20, 2019, the Defendant issued a medical care approval on the part of the injury and disease for which the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with respect to “the upper injury and disease of this case” on the ground that there was no observation of the pelvis of the pelvis and the pelvis of the main part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the medical care benefits, and there is no proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the instant injury and injury since the observation of the pelvise of the pelvis and the pelvise of the pelvise under the direction of the upper part of the upper part of the medical care benefits and there is no urgent opinion.

'A disposition of non-approval of part of the medical care was made.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

(D) The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for examination with the Defendant, but the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s request on May 3, 2019. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute, and the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) of the Plaintiff.

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is only the right arms and shoulders in the process of the fall down at the workplace due to the accident of this case, and thereafter.