2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won shall be one day.

On March 22, 2015, at around 03:53, the Defendant: (a) 112 of the week called “D” in Gwangju-si, while drunked, and was called “D”; (b) the Defendant f, a police officer of the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station E District E District, a police officer of the Gyeonggi Police Station, who was called for home from G, was urged to return home from G, and (c) the said F, “I am out,” and the Defendant f, “I am out of the city, am argue, am argue, am in the city, and math from the road, am in his hand,” and assaulted the lower part of the said F’s chest part on a single f’s breast part on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Legal statement of witness F;

3. Application of the police protocol law to G

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

2. Formal concurrence, Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment, the selection of fines.

3. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which is the period of suspension of execution for violent crimes, should be criticized that the Defendant again committed the instant crime, but the circumstances leading to the instant case and the degree of interference with official duties, etc. shall be determined as set forth in the Disposition, taking into account the fact that the Defendant was under suspension of execution for violent crimes.