성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant from March 20, 2015 to the same year.
8.3. From around 17:30, up to 17:30, the Defendant’s operation “E” business place located in Asan City D, 2 stories, 10 rooms with simple flood, 2 shower rooms, and 1 toilets, and employed female employees such as F, etc., then receiving KRW 110,000 from male customers and paying KRW 60,00 among them to female employees, and had female employees have sexual intercourse with customers, thereby engaging in activities such as arranging sexual traffic.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers against the defendant B or F;
1. A real estate lease agreement;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (overtime 8)
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The portion not guilty, such as the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing is the time of committing the crime and the mistake is against the defendant, the first crime, the period of business, and the profit, etc., in the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Additional Collection of Commercial Sex Acts;
1. The summary of the facts charged against Defendant B was the owner of the building at the Mabro (hereinafter “the instant establishment”) for the operation of the Mabro (hereinafter “E”), the Defendant provided the building owned by the Defendant for commercial sex acts on October 24, 2014, on the ground that the Defendant’s construction was controlled by the police officer in charge in the Gaba Police Station located in the Gaba-dong, A to the fact that G was in operation of commercial sex acts at the instant establishment. After G, around March 20, 2015, the Defendant provided the instant establishment with a security deposit of KRW 20 million and KRW 1.5 million and provided the building with the knowledge of the fact that G was in operation of commercial sex acts at the instant establishment.
2. The judgment of this Court has been duly adopted and examined by this Court.