Nevertheless, the defendant, by implementing the youth internship system in the Ministry of Employment and Labor, came to know that the defendant can receive subsidies from the Ministry of Employment and Labor if he/she concludes an internship agreement with the introduction of the internship staff through the litigation of the Inyang Air and Fishing Council, which is an incorporated organization, and allows the relevant internship staff to work as regular employees.

However, the Defendant prepared the standard internship support agreement and other documents as the standard internship support agreement, etc. as if he/she had been employed as an employee in B as an intern employee, and applied for the internship support fund to receive the subsidy by unlawful means.

During the period of Ansan-si, the Defendant, while operating the Motor Vehicle Maintenance Business Co., Ltd., prepared documents as if he/she employed D employed as an intern employee from September 22, 2014 to March 23, 2015, and received subsidies from the Ansan Employment Center of the Korea Employment and Labor Agency of Middle-gu to denied the amount of KRW 4,33,550 for youth internship support from the Ansan Employment Center of the Korea Employment and Labor Agency of Middle-gu.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment, the standard internship support agreement, the application for the standard internship support agreement, the standard internship agreement, and the commuting card (D) on September 22, 2014, the Defendant was recommended by the Ansan Air Conference on September 22, 2014 and entered D in the application for the internship employment as of September 22, 2014, but the Defendant had D had D work from September 22, 2014 as the previous employee, even though he was entered on September 24, 2014. However, so long as the Defendant was found to have employed as a new intern employee upon recommendation by the sub-committee of the Ansan Air, it is reasonable for the Defendant to receive the subsidy.