If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Defendant

1. E convenience stores operated by victims D in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 28, 2016, around 19:00, in which the market price equivalent to 4,500 won at the display stand by using a gap in which the surveillance of victims is neglected;

Bana 1 Ga and Gaba,

2. E convenience stores operated by victims D on July 28, 2016, around 23:30 around 20, at around 2016, a mersh in an amount equivalent to 4,500 won at the market price in the display stand using a gap in which the surveillance of victims is neglected.

Bana 1 Ga and thefted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 329 (Selection of Penalty Penalty)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Provisional Payment Order is that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the past record of the same kind of crime in several times, or that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime of this case, and that the damage to the crime of this case is minor, etc. In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.