The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

No person shall transfer or take over a means of access or borrow a means of access in return for any reward or in return for any reward.

1. On June 2014, Defendant A around the end of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, at a subway 7-line Damar Damar Dambook, the Defendant received KRW 1,500,000 per week in return for lending the passbook, etc. from the person in default of his/her name, and transferred the means of access to his/her name in a manner that Kwikset through Kwikset’s service, cash cards connected with the investment securities account (F) in the name of the Defendant, to the person in default of his/her name, and inform him/her of the password by telephone.

2. Around June 28, 2014, Defendant B received KRW 200,000 from the deceased in return for lending the passbook, etc. from the deceased in front of Taeyang-gu G Apartment 205, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu. Around June 28, 2014, the Defendant transferred the means of access to the name in a way that Kwikset service connects Kwikset with a passbook (Account Number: H) and a check connected with the SCB bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A copy of the I;

1. Application of details of transactions, certificates of deposit, statutes;

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Each of the Defendants shall be punished by a fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act