대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the descriptions in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as well as the overall purport of testimony and pleadings by witnesses C, the Plaintiff, upon the Defendant’s request, remitted not only KRW 17 million to the Defendant on May 5, 2013, but also to the Defendant’s account, KRW 20 million on May 7, 2013, 200, KRW 63 million on May 20, 2013, KRW 30 million on May 24, 2013, and KRW 70 million on June 5, 2013, respectively. Upon the Defendant’s request, the fact that the Plaintiff remitted KRW 30 million to the Nonparty’s account on October 8, 2013, and KRW 20 million on October 11, 2013 can be acknowledged.
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim
A. The summary of the parties' assertion 1) The plaintiff lent 300 million won in total to the defendant's account directly or by the defendant's transfer of money to the above C's account designated by the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay 300 million won and damages for delay to the plaintiff. 2) The defendant's plaintiff remitted 300 million won to the defendant or C's account for the purpose of investing in the illegal gambling site of the operation of the non-party D, and let the plaintiff deliver it to D. The defendant did not borrow money from the plaintiff. Even if the monetary lending relationship is acknowledged, the above money constitutes illegal consideration under Article 746 of the Civil Act, and thus, the plaintiff cannot seek a return against the defendant.
나. 판단 살피건대, 갑 제1, 3, 6, 8호증, 을 제2호증의 각 기재와 증인 C, E의 각 일부 증언 및 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 원고가 그 소유의 부동산을 담보로 대출을 받아서까지 동서인 피고에게 금전을 대여해 준다는 것은 원피고 사이의 관계를 고려해 보더라도 다소 이례적인 점, ② 원고의 금원이 송금된 피고의 계좌(갑 제1호증 참조)에서 여러 차례에 걸쳐 뭉칫돈이 현금으로 인출되었던바, 위 금원이 불법 도박사이트의 자금으로 들어간 것으로 보이는 점, ③ 피고는 원고로부터 소개받은 소외 F을...