If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

[2014 High-level 1102] On January 18, 2014, the Defendant filed a lawsuit of consolation money claim with the Changwon District Court in the past, which had been a pet in the 304 dong B apartment 304 dong 1101 prior to the 1101-dong 101, but dismissed the lawsuit of consolation money claim, but it was found to find the above victim to spread the above victim, but it did not open the door, thereby damaging its utility by damaging the digital drawings worth KRW 530,00 at the market price.

[2014 High Court Decision 1103]

1. On January 8, 2014, at around 16:30, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by opening a digital painting E in an amount equivalent to 200,000 won in the market price, which was installed at the apartment entrance of the victim’s apartment owned by the victim’s C, 304 Dong 1101, and then replacing it with another digital painting.

2. The Defendant, by means of opening the entrance doors of the victim and entering the living room in the time, place, and place prescribed in paragraph (1) in the same manner as in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[2014 High Court Decision 1102]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Photographs (2014 high-scale 1103);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.