beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고단888

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 7, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 1.5 million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on July 7, 2008, and on January 17, 2013, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years by the same court on January 25, 2013, and is still under the grace period.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.116% without a vehicle driver’s license, and on November 28, 2013, the Defendant was driving a DNA clurd car at 300 meters from the roads near Incheon Gyeyang-gu to the horizontal road located in 743 (Operation Dong) as 743 (Operation Dong) of the same Gu.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in the preceding paragraph, had the superintendent E belonging to the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, which was under the influence of drinking driving, enter the drinking driver into a “F” on the part of the police officer as the result of the police officer’s criminal record of the control of drinking driving of the portable Information Terminal (PDA), and signed the signature as if he was the F’s signature, and presented it to the police officer who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the F's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, committed the act of forging private documents and uttering of a falsified document, as mentioned above, to the above police officer as if he was F, and then stated “F” in the driver column in the report on the state of the driver’s situation, issued by the above police officer, and affixed a seal affixed to the driver’s name and submitted it to the above police officer who knew of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forges the part of the driver's disturbance in F, which is a private document related to the certification of fact.

참조조문