However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 22:00 on August 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered the main points of “D” operated by the victim C (the 43-year-old), located in Busan District captain B; and (b) obstructed the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force by avoiding disturbance for about 50 minutes. However, the Defendant: (a) allowed the victim to drink, but the victim was making a drinking on the ground that the victim was refusing to do so; (b) reported to 12 as follows: (c) “I do not have to do so; (d) I want to have a restaurant business license; and (e) the Defendant obstructed the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to the poorness of a crime, but considering reflect, agreement, etc.);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;