A. The Defendant, who is a police officer, did not have the same desire as the facts charged, to G, a police officer.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unfair sentencing (the fine of 800,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court on the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the Defendant, upon completing a meeting for the promotion of peaceful unification held by an I organization on March 9, 2012, was dissatisfied with F, the president of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan D 1st century as an issue of drinking value; (ii) the police officer G, who was called upon upon receipt of the report, demanded the police officer G to present his identification card several times; (iii) the Defendant, etc. to be subject to punishment for fraud; and (iv) the Defendant, etc., sent the police officer, etc., to the outside of the said police officer’s desire to have the said police officer sent out of the police station, and was unable to have the police officer present his or her desire to have the police officer present his or her desire to appear out of the police station, and (v) the Defendant, etc., who was aware of his or her desire to have the police officer present his or her desire not to have the police officer present his or her desire to take out of the police station.

(b).