2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have recognized and reflect his own criminal act is favorable, but the damage has not yet been recovered to the extent that it does not have been agreed with the victim, and the same criminal act was committed in the same way, including two times of imprisonment, and there have been a majority of these crimes, and the sentencing date has been postponed on the grounds of agreement at the court below, and the sentencing date has been postponed on the grounds of agreement at the court below. In full view of other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.