However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 11, 2013, the Defendant purchased HG vehicles from Hyundai Motor HG agencies in Seo-gu, Daegu-ro 124, and filed an application with the victim B Co., Ltd. for a loan of 48 months, monthly payment of 822,083 won, and on the condition of repayment of principal and interest equal in repayment method, the Defendant applied for a loan of 34 million won under the name of the wife C.

However, even if the Defendant received a loan from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan. However, the summary operated by the Defendant

Since the construction cost of the main place was urgently required, it was thought that the vehicle would immediately be sold and financed by the vehicle.

After deceiving the victim as such, the Defendant purchased the franchise HG vehicle with a loan of KRW 34 million from the victim, i.e., at the victim’s seat, and on July 12, 2013, after completing the registration of the vehicle in the front of the wife C, sold the above franchise HG vehicle to others on the same day. The victim paid a total of KRW 2,564,057 for four months, and paid a total of KRW 2,564,057, and paid a total of KRW 31,435,943 for the remainder of the loans.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an application for vehicle purchase loan;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;