When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol from the “E” vehicle of the victim D’s operation “E” in the granting group C around 05:40 on December 4, 2017, the Defendant was in combination with the next table table, and (b) he was in line with all of the Defendant’s calculation.

The victim demanded credit to the victim while making the request for credit to the other customer, and the victim demanded that the other customer separately calculates the credit, "I am the other side,"

I expressed the desire of this species, i.e., bit of bitbit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant does not answer to the police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report on the same content as described in paragraph 1, G from the F District of the police station that was assigned the police station and the assistant H, and without being asked by the said police officer about his personal information, and whether the Defendant “Is the instant police officer would be in fluort.

B. There is no finite, and there is no identification card.

The brination was made as “,” and the brination was made on the hand, etc. of the H as the brination was made against the H.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (Attachment to video CDs and caps);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the accused is recognized to be erroneous; (b) the victim of the obstruction of business does not want to be punished; (c) the degree of interference with business and official duties; and (d) the Defendant’s age, the records of the crime (before two years and one time before 200), sex behavior, environment, and circumstances.