When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 04:00, the Defendant: (b) fluencing alcohol on the part of the victim E (the 'F main point operated by the victim E (the 40 years of age, women) in Gangseo-si; and (c) damaged the victim's property by putting the card into the main calculation unit, 'whether the card is safe; and (d) flusing the card into the main calculation unit, and walking the card 374,000 won at the above-mentioned market price, putting one card size of the card size equivalent to 374,000 won at his/her hand, while walking in the cooling station of alcoholic beverages, breaking the gas 150,000 won at the market price.

2. The injured Defendant reported the victim to the police station at the above temporary location, thereby causing injuries to the victim, such as salt pans, tensions and tensions, salt pans, tensions and tensions, etc., which require approximately 14 days’ medical treatment, by taking the victim’s knobs by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. A report on internal investigation (a written estimate, diagnostic document, field photograph, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (Attachment to a written estimate for repair costs of alcoholic beverages refrigerants);

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to property), and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Claims by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and determination of the provisional payment order

1. The defendant asserts that he did not assault E, but rather he did not think that E was intending to assault himself, and that he was defended of E's hand by putting his hand, and that the defendant did not damage the card size by leaving the card size in hand, but did not cause any intention of damage because he was separated from E and it did not cause any damage, and that the defendant did not agree to walk the cooling and glass.

2. We examine the judgment, and this Court.