대여금
1. The Defendant: (a) 5% per annum for KRW 60 million and KRW 60 million from June 17, 2013 to September 17, 2013 to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum for the Plaintiff.
Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiff loaned the defendant a total of KRW 30 million on May 16, 201, KRW 10 million on January 9, 2012, KRW 10 million on November 27, 2012, KRW 60 million on May 28, 2013, and the defendant paid interest on each of the above loans until May 24, 2013, but did not pay interest thereafter. The defendant paid interest on September 17, 2013, but again paid KRW 20 million on September 10, 2013 to the plaintiff on the loan date, and the defendant could recognize the fact that the above loan was not paid to the plaintiff on the loan date.
According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 60 million and interest of KRW 60 million from June 17, 2013 to September 17, 2013, 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act for KRW 60 million, 40 million from September 18, 2013 to October 10, 2013, the above annual amount of KRW 5%, and 60 million from October 11, 2013 to March 3, 2016, the delivery date of documents corresponding to the instant complaint, with 5% per annum as to KRW 60 million, and 15% per annum as to delay damages from the following day to September 4, 2016. < Amended by Act No. 14088, Mar. 4, 2016>
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.