근저당권말소
1. The defendant on November 22, 2004 with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.
There is no dispute between the parties, or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement in subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the evidence Nos. 1-2, the plaintiff leased real estate as stated in paragraph (2) of the attached Table to the defendant around November 2004 and completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring real estate as stated in the attached Table in order to secure the obligation to refund the lease deposit amount of KRW 30 million, and the plaintiff thereafter returned the above lease deposit to the defendant.
According to the above facts, since the secured debt of the above mortgage has ceased to exist, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of the registration of establishment of a mortgage near the order to the plaintiff.
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.