The guilty part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

. Prosecutors;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

(c)

Defendant

C1) As to the list 22 (AJ) of the crime committed by mistake of facts, the Defendant did not have managed the passbook of AJ, and there was no fact that the Defendant had allowed A to manage the personnel expenses paid for the account under the name of AJ or received a return from AJ.

2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

(d)

1) The judgment of the court below that acquitted Defendants A and B on the acquitted portion of the judgment of the court below that acquitted Defendants A and B on the grounds of normal advisory fees, etc., although the Defendants offered convenience to Defendant D’s constructive public official in relation to his duties, and the Defendants offered and received bribe under false advisory fees and sufficiently recognized the facts constituting a crime of which Defendants B provided and provided subsidies.

2) The sentence that the lower court sentenced to Defendant A, B, and C is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court, based on the evidence duly investigated and adopted by the lower court, conducted research as a participating researcher of the “CG task,” i.e., that graduate students in practice have to leave the head of the Tong to the laboratory for the registration of the Institute, and at the court of the lower court, AJ ordered Defendant C to withdraw cash frequently, including the head of the Tong in his name, and received the head of the Tong and sent the head of the Tong to ATM for each time, and stated to the effect that part of the Defendant C was received from Defendant C, and at the court of the lower court, A stated that “When there is a trace of the regularly withdrawing the personnel expenses of Defendant C in terms of the amount of KRW 1,00,000, the head of the Tong and the control of entry was to be followed.”